State of the Union

Party like it’s 2008!

Watching the State of the Union with the troops Obama so needs to mobilize -- again

Vice President Joe Biden, President Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi

Forget about Scott Brown. Forget about Gallup polls. Forget Cornhusker kickbacks, Joe Lieberman, uneasy rumblings about a Republican House and all that scary, dispiriting, ugly business.

For the 20 people gathered at one of the State of the Union “watch parties” put on by Organizing for America, it was 2008 again on Wednesday night, and all was right with the world. There was Barack Obama, gazing down in Shepard Fairey’s iconic blue and red print from the living room wall at his image on the TV across the room. There was David Plouffe on the speakerphone before the speech, just like in the good old days, when he rallied the troops to bury John McCain and the entire Republican Party in an army of voters. And best of all, as far as these activists were concerned, the strangely passive president — held hostage to his own party’s inability to actually use its majority in Congress — was gone, replaced by someone who sounded an awful lot like the guy who inspired a movement two years ago.

“It’s like he’s back,” said Kristin Szakos, the party’s host. Szakos, who got involved in Obama’s campaign online nearly three years ago and wound up a regional coordinator in the general election, is more or less the Platonic ideal of the type of engagement Obama aides said they were building all along. After the 2008 election ended, she decided to focus on local politics, and finding no candidates she could convince to run for Charlottesville’s city council, she ran — and won — herself last year.

But the time since candidate Obama became President Obama hasn’t necessarily been so pleasant for Szakos and her guests. Governing, it turns out, is a lot less inspiring than campaigning, even with enormous numbers of Democrats in Congress behind Obama. “It’s ugly, and it’s frustrating, and it’s soul-sucking” to watch the legislative process churn along, she said. “And I think for most of us who want our morals black and white, and who believe that there is such a thing as right and wrong — and you should know which one is which, and just do it — to watch legislation happen is really hard… People are watching more closely, and they’re seeing how nasty it gets. People like me never really watched Congress work quite so closely as they have this time.”

This part of Virginia was the home of one of the great triumphs of the Obama campaign two years ago. Not only did he win the state, the first Democrat to do so in 44 years, but a surge of new voters helped knock Republican Rep. Virgil Goode out of his House seat in favor of Democrat Tom Perriello. A year later, though, most of those voters sat home as Republican Bob McDonnell cruised to the governor’s mansion (and the GOP response Wednesday night, which Szakos refused to let anyone watch in her house, afraid he’d crush the spirit Obama had revived). Progressives are still organizing actively here; the OFA Web site listed 15 watch parties within 45 miles of Charlottesville. But a lot of their energy has been going into the endless fight to pass healthcare reform, and it was starting to wane.

“They needed a pep talk,” said Jim Nix, a retired intelligence analyst and another campaign volunteer-turned-Democratic leader — he went from “apprentice envelope-stuffer” in early 2007 to, as of last week, co-chairman of the Charlottesville City Democratic Committee. Many of the people at Szakos’s house for the watch party had been making phone calls into Massachusetts to try to turn out the vote for Martha Coakley. “It was really a shock when that didn’t work.”

So there was a lot of nervous energy in the room, even before the speech. The volunteers arrived at 7:30 p.m., a full 90 minutes before Obama was scheduled to arrive in the House chamber. They were supposed to hear from Perriello by phone, but Szakos didn’t have long-distance service on her home line, and by the time someone figured out how to dial into D.C., he had already headed in to hear the address. (He nabbed a good seat, and the party cheered him every time he appeared on TV; a campaign staffer promised everyone there would be able to get on a conference call with Perriello on Thursday.)

A few minutes later, a Democratic National Committee computer system rang the phone, connecting the party to some hold music and, eventually, to Plouffe and OFA director Mitch Stewart. “This speech, I hope, will really rekindle a lot of enthusiasm,” Plouffe said. “Barack Obama ran to try to change Washington — he can’t do it alone.” The DNC will be tapping everyone to try to get voters out in the November midterms, he promised. Everyone at the party was instructed, by Szakos, to call 10 people in the next few days and get them to call their House and Senate members to support healthcare reform.

Chatting anxiously after Plouffe hung up, no one paid any attention to the TV anchors babbling before Obama arrived. “I wish he would move to the left,” said Jim Miller, a retired textbook editor and professor from Earlysville, Va. “The people need to know that there’s a man in the White House who’s on their side.” Some other activists complained about friends who hadn’t voted in the gubernatorial race, or fretted that recent Citizens United court ruling would, effectively, be the end of democracy.

But as soon as the speech started, Szakos cut the lights, and the room fell quiet. And then it slowly came back to life, with people murmuring approval for Obama’s new feisty tone, and clapping at the applause lines. The first time the camera panned to McCain and some other Senate Republicans in the audience, someone called out, “Fuck ‘em.” Like Democratic officials in Washington, the OFA volunteers were shocked to see no Republicans cheering Obama’s promise to pass a jobs bill or crack down on Wall Street. Not everything Obama said won his partisans over; his pledge for nuclear energy and so-called “clean coal” got booed, as did his call for a spending freeze. But the populist streak, and especially the call for Democrats in Congress to remember that they still run the place, got people cheering.

And when Obama wrapped up by promising resolve, it was clear that at least some of the loyal supporters who got him to the White House are ready to get back to work. “We don’t quit — I don’t quit,” the president said. “Now show it!” someone yelled back at the TV.

Come Thursday morning, of course, the depressing reality could still be that the speech, on its own, didn’t change much in Washington. But if Obama is really ready to fight for his agenda, the speech may have helped him put the army he’ll need back together.

Mike Madden is Salon's Washington correspondent. A complete listing of his articles is here. Follow him on Twitter here.

LIVEBLOG: Obama calls for taxing the wealthy

In populist speech, president promises to act if Congress won't VIDEO

SNL: Michele Bachmann sequel

Once more, with reeling, as Saturday Night Live spoofs the Republican's speech

The president ignored the elephant in the room

Obama's calls for innovation are politically astute but ignore the looming problem of unemployment

President Barack Obama talks with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., left, and Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 25, 2011, after delivering his State of the Union address. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, Pool)(Credit: AP)

The President’s new emphasis on the importance of investing in education, infrastructure, and basic research in order to build the nation’s long-term competitive capacities is appropriate. For the last three decades the federal government’s spending on these three essentials has declined as a percentage of its total spending, arguably threatening America’s technological and economic leadership.

But the President’s failure to address this decoupling of American corporate profits from American jobs, and explain specifically what he’ll do to get jobs back, not only risks making his grand plans for reviving the nation’s “competitiveness” seem somewhat beside the point but also cedes to Republicans the dominant narrative.

The address he gave last night could have been given (indeed, was given) by Democrats in the 1980s when Japan seemed to threaten America’s preeminence. Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign manifesto, “Putting People First,” laid out the case. Only now the competitive threat comes from China.

 

A similar call for economic patriotism and public investment emerged in the 1950s and 1960s, when the competitive threat was the Soviet Union. John F. Kennedy challenged America to get to the moon ahead of the Soviets. Before him, Republican president Dwight Eisenhower committed the nation to building the interstate highways system – forty-one thousand miles of four-lane (sometimes even six-lane) freeways to replace the old two-lane federal roads that meandered through cities and towns – in order to speed troops, tanks, and munitions across the nation in the event of war. And a National Defense Education Act to educate a generation of mathematicians and scientists to catch up with the Soviets in space.

 

President Obama made the parallel explicit:

Half a century ago, when the Soviets beat us into space with the launch of a satellite called Sputnik, we had no idea how we’d beat them to the moon,” he said. “But after investing in better research and education, we didn’t just surpass the Soviets’ we unleashed a wave of innovation that created new industries and millions of new jobs. This is our generation’s Sputnik moment.

 

Reviving these ideas, and the feelings they provoke, is politically astute. A call for national unity and economic patriotism is places the President above partisan rancor, and gives him a rationale for a strong and effective government at a time when Republicans want nothing so much as to shrink it.

 

But the new theme also poses a danger of appearing to ignore the elephant in the room – the nation’s continuing scourge of high unemployment that shows little sign of abating any time soon.

It’s one thing to challenge the nation to re-embark on the equivalent of a race to the moon when most people feel confident about their own family finances, but quite another when economic security is as endemic as now.

The President understandably wants Americans to feel upbeat about the economic recovery – “two years after the worst recession most of us have ever known, the stock market has come roaring back Corporate profits are up. The economy is growing again,” he said – but little of this has yet trickled down to ordinary people who continue to be plagued by a huge debt load, business’s unwillingness to create full-time jobs, and a still fragile housing market.

 

The Great Recession wasn’t due to America’s loss of “competitiveness” relative to the Chinese or anyone else. In fact, American corporations are now enormously competitive, now racking up some of their highest profits in history. But much of their success is occurring outside the United States. GE, whose CEO, Jeffrey Immelt, was just tapped to head Mr. Obama’s new advisory council on jobs and competitiveness, has more foreign employees than American. General Motors now sells and makes more cars in China than at home.

 

They and their supply-side economists say the nation got into trouble because government became too large, and the answer is therefore to cut spending, cut taxes, and shrink the deficit. The President, having apparently given up on Keynesian pump-priming, has no retort except to invest for the long term.

 

What the President should have done is talk frankly about the central structural flaw in the U.S. economy – the dwindling share of its gains going to the vast middle class, and the almost unprecedented concentration of income and wealth at top – in sharp contrast to the Eisenhower and Kennedy years.

Although the economy is more than twice as large as it was thirty years ago, the median wage has barely budged. Most of the gains from growth have gone to the richest Americans, whose portion of total income soared from around 9 percent in the late 1970s to 23.5 percent in 2007. Americans kept spending anyway by using their homes as ATMs but the bursting of the housing bubble put an end to that – leaving them without enough purchasing power to reboot the economy. So the central challenge is to rev up consumer spending by putting more money into the pockets average Americans.

 

This narrative would be politically risky (opening Mr. Obama to the charge of being a “class warrior”) but at least honest. And it would allow him to connect the dots – explaining why his new health-care law is critical to reducing medical costs for most working families, why tax reform requires cutting taxes on the middle class while raising them on the rich, why the Bush tax cuts shouldn’t be extended for the wealthy, why deficit reduction must not sacrifice education and infrastructure (both important to rebuilding middle-class prosperity) and why any cuts in Social Security or Medicare must be on the backs of the wealthy rather than average working families.

Importantly, it would give him a convincing counter-narrative to the Republican anti-government one. Government exists to protect and advance the interests of average working families. Without it, Americans have to rely mainly big and increasingly global corporations, whose only interest is making money wherever it can be made.

 

Continue Reading Close

Robert Reich, one of the nation’s leading experts on work and the economy, is Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. Time Magazine has named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written 13 books, including his latest best-seller, “Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future;” “The Work of Nations,” which has been translated into 22 languages; and his newest, an e-book, “Beyond Outrage.” His syndicated columns, television appearances, and public radio commentaries reach millions of people each week. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, and Chairman of the citizen’s group Common Cause. His widely-read blog can be found at www.robertreich.org.

This guy really hated the State of the Union

Republican Rep. Paul Broun sat in his office calling the president a Marxist on Twitter, like a common blogger

Paul Broun

While many members of Congress elected to watch last night’s State of the Union address while seated next to a member of the opposite party, in an awkward display of bipartisanship and civility, one House member was brave enough to watch the whole thing from his office, Tweeting fevered nonsense the whole time. That hero is Rep. Paul Broun, of Georgia.

Broun previously warned that the president was showing “signs of being Marxist,” as well as doing “exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany,” so really no one should be surprised that this guy was not impressed by the president’s vision of “winning the future.”

And that’s why he wrote, as the speech wrapped up, “Mr. President, you don’t believe in the Constitution. You believe in socialism.”

While there’s not really anything in the Constitution that precludes a little light Scandinavian-style socialism, Broun is a modern-day Republican moron, and so for him the “s-word” means some scary combination of the Third Reich and the Great Purge. (If you can find the passage in Obama’s relentlessly centrist address that sounds like a proposal for a Great Leap Forward, please let me know, because all I remember is the bit about cutting corporate taxes and something about smoked salmon.)

Broun is a crafty fellow — he knew that the “sit with someone from the other party” proposal was an elaborate ruse designed to oppress the opposition.

“I already believe very firmly that it is a trap and a ruse that Democrats are proposing,” Broun said. “They don’t want civility. They want silence from the Republicans. And the sitting together being kissy-kissy is just another way to try to silence Republicans, and also to show — to keep the American people from seeing how few of them there are in the U.S. House now.”

Broun says he chose to avoid the chamber and liveblog from his office “out of respect.” Respect for whichever unlucky member was assigned to sit next to one of the dumbest members of the Republican caucus, I imagine.

Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

David Gergen and Ari Fleischer fight over education, jobs

Discussing Obama's State of the Union address, the two White House veterans get riled up over the jobs problem

David Gergen and Ari Fleischer face off.

If only more political debates could be based on real experience with the issues. Here are David Gergen — presidential advisor under Nixon, Ford, Reagon and Clinton — and former White House Press Secretary debating cutting education spending in the face of the nation’s jobs crisis.

Adam Clark Estes blogs the news for Salon. Email him at ace@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @adamclarkestes

Page 1 of 15 in State of the Union

www.salon.com/topic/state_of_the_union/